Wonder If THIS Will Make Obama’s SOTU Address? *Open Thread*

by

That would be the bill landing on Obama’s desk from the House to repeal Obamacare. In the midst of Obama’s grandstanding on Gun Control Tuesday, not to mention the blow up in the Middle East, and with his last (thank heavens) State of the Union Address looming for next Tuesday, the House is actually pushing forward with a Repeal of Obamacare.

Yes, that “do-nothing Congress” (read: does not do everything Obama demands it do) has actually, finally, crafted a Repeal bill of Obamacare, rather than a Replace Bill. From The Hill:

[…] While some Republicans have pushed to put forward an alternative to ObamaCare, others have argued that full repeal should be the first priority.

The repeal argument has won out for now. By approving the reconciliation bill, Republicans hope they will bolster their chances in the 2016 elections by showing voters what would happen if they controlled Washington.

The repeal vote is being accomplished through reconciliation, a complex budget tactic that allowed Republicans to bypass a filibuster from Senate Democrats.

GOP leaders in both chambers adopted the reconciliation strategy after the 2014 elections, when Republicans won control of Congress for the first time since 2006.

Passage of the bill could help persuade the conservative base that congressional Republicans remain committed to fully repealing the law, despite setbacks.

“You can use this bill once a year, and we used it for this,” Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) recently said on conservative host Bill Bennett’s national radio show.

Getting to this point wasn’t smooth. Some of the party’s presidential hopefuls, including Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), argued the reconciliation bill did not go far enough to repeal the law. Rubio ultimately voted for the bill, while Cruz did not. […] (Click here to read the rest.)

In other words, with the Reconciliation tool, the Republicans are doing what the Democrats did to get this abysmal law passed in the first place. It is about damn time they turned the tactics used by the Democrats against them, isn’t it?

Oh, and I am not being hyperbolic when I claim this law has been abysmal. From the Daily Signal:

[…] Although it faces certain veto, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the president is only buying time for a dying law. Obamacare is in bad shape—both economically and ethically. If it were possible for a law to repeal itself, this one would be well on the way.

It’s becoming increasingly clear that the president is only buying time for a dying law

Simply put, three years into its implementation, the internal contradictions and weaknesses of Obamacare are multiplying.

Failing Co-Ops

First, more than half of the health insurance co-ops established under the bill went belly-up just as the open season began on the Obamacare insurance exchanges. Millions of dollars in federal loan guarantees went down the drain. In late October, the Kentucky Health Cooperative was, as its website decorously says, placed “into rehabilitation.” Several days later, the people of Kentucky elected a new governor who is opposed to Obamacare.

Soon after, United Health Care, the largest private insurer in the country, announced it was lowering its investment in marketing the Obamacare exchanges because of major financial losses.

The number of Co-ops failing are very high indeed which, by the way, means MORE wasteful spending of your hard-earned tax dollars. The biggest Obamacare Co-op in has gone belly up already. Not only is our money being wasted, but the justification for this law in the first place – insuring those who cannot afford insurance or do not have it – fails miserably.

Then there is this issue. Again, from the Daily Signal:

[…] In order to ensure that Americans buying insurance on the exchanges would have at least one option that excludes coverage of elective abortion, Obamacare incentivized states to establish multi-state plans (MSPs) that could be offered to consumers everywhere.

These plans are administered by the federal Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and are designed to have access to millions of consumers eligible for premium subsidies in the exchange system.

In order to qualify as multi-state plans, however, the insurers were obliged to have their multi-state plan available in more states each year, beginning at 30 the first year and eventually reaching all 50 four years later.

This “glide path” to a 50-state multi-state plan system was less than ideal for pro-life advocates because it held the potential that some states would have no publicly subsidized plan with pro-life provisions for many years.

That concern was borne out, as the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) has documented, as a number of states offered no pro-life alternative health plan as Obamacare began.

Now even some existing OPM-managed multi-state plans are faltering. […] (Click here to read the rest.)

Which surprises me not one bit.

All I can say is that I cannot WAIT for this law to be repealed. I know that just for us, the changes we have had to make in our healthcare coverage are massive. We have higher premiums for far less coverage, much higher deductibles, and more out-of-pocket expenses, all thanks to Obamacare.

And not for nothing, but Obamacare is another way in which this President has acted un-Constitutionally by holding back some parts of the law that are particularly unpalatable during election years. That is how he rolls – as a Dictator rather than as a US President.

The ineffectiveness, the cost, the lack of coverage, the forced coverage in some areas are just some of the reasons this law must be repealed, and then replaced with something that works. Hence the importance of getting a Republican in the White House who will allow it to be repealed. If we end up with a President Clinton or Sanders (heaven forfend), we will be stuck with this law forever.

And frankly, that idea just makes me sick.

This is an Open Thread.

Advertisements

Tags: , , ,

17 Responses to “Wonder If THIS Will Make Obama’s SOTU Address? *Open Thread*”

  1. kenoshamarge Says:

    My guess is that the Republicans trying to repeal ObamaCare will be accused of playing politics while Obama, playing politics and obfuscation for all he’s worth, will be lionized as working to make American safe from all those gun-toting Americans who have never committed a crime in their life. Just a guess.

    • Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy Says:

      No doubt you are right, Marge. The Dems have continued to demonize everyone who speaks out against Obamacare, but even members of the MSM have had to admit that it is not working. And the majority of Americans still oppose it.

      But yeah, the Reps are the ones making political hay unlike Obama and his trusty pen…

  2. Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy Says:

    WOW – two different News outlets – AP and WaPo – factchecked Obama’s proclamation yesterday. Oh, and they both acknowledged some holes in what he had to say: http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/06/ap-fact-check-obama-gun-control-actions-wouldnt-have-stopped-any-mass-shooting/

    • kenoshamarge Says:

      I’m guessing again, but it may be that some of the media is starting to try to regain some of their own credibility after having been Obama’s lap dogs for over 7 years. If that’s it, it is too little too late.

      Once trust is lost…

      • Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy Says:

        Yeah, that might be their intent, but after all these years of being propaganda pawns for Obama and the Dems, I don’t think many of us will be buying what they are selling…

    • mcnorman Says:

      http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_thomas_sowell/showman_in_chief

      • Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy Says:

        Outstanding piece by Sowell. I know he doesn’t REALLY expect Obama and his minions to consider FACTS when showmanship is what seems to rule the day now…

    • kinthenorthwest Says:

      You CANNOT buy a gun on the internet or gun show without having a background check. If you buy on the internet it is send to a licensed gun dealer who will not transfer until you pass a background check.
      What Obama is doing is hurting the gun owners who happen to be on meds that could be used for Psychotic reasons. Many many psychotic meds are used for other things besides mental illness like quitting smoking, nerve damage, and the list goes on.

      • Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy Says:

        Exactly, Kin. Thank you for highlighting that aspect of Sowell’s piece. So much of what Obama said was smoke and mirrors; so much of it would make not one BIT of difference with the mass murders, including the TERROR attack that keeps getting lumped in with these other examples as if it was not a terror attack; and relying on emotion other than facts to circumvent the Congress and Constitution. Just incredible…

  3. kenoshamarge Says:

  4. piper Says:

    ISIS already control the Libyan Mediterranean port city of Sirte, which they would then use to distribute their oil globally. Pretty sophisticated for a JV team, ‘eh?

    Link: http://www.weaselzippers.us/249190-isis-battles-regime-forces-as-it-presses-its-advance-on-libyas-key-oil-fields/

    • Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy Says:

      Oh, boy – yeah, talk abt minimizing a group at our own peril…It is just amazing how Obama’s arrogance has allowed this terrorist group to rise…

  5. mcnorman Says:

    If anyone has forgotten, this was a great piece on how Ted got to be Ted.

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/ted-cruz-supreme-court-conservative-213497#ixzz3wNFnRKv9

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: